Before diving into the commentary, I want to share a chart posted by Crescat Capital’s Tavi Costa. China, the world’s largest consumer of commodities, just reported record imports of silver at a time when the country is reportedly installing clean energy at the equivalent rate of five large nuclear power plants per week.
Silver is an important component of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, meaning that for China to reach its ambitious climate targets, it must import massive amounts of the white metal. In June alone, China spent over $228 million on silver, a new monthly record based on Bloomberg data going back to 2009.
Noise with Consequences
Social media has become the place where many of us spend our time, share our lives and, increasingly, get our news. An estimated 12 billion combined hours are spent every day on these platforms, which now host over 5.3 billion unique “identities” or accounts.
With scaling like that, misinformation can spread like wildfire. We’ve all seen the headlines, the “fake news” and the deepfakes that make you question your own eyes.
For investors, this isn’t just about the latest gossip. Misinformation (information that’s false or inaccurate) and disinformation (fake news deliberately meant to confuse and deceive) can move markets. A recent study showed a significant correlation between social media interactions and short-term stock market movements.
This isn’t just noise; it’s noise with consequences. Last year, Nationwide Mutual Insurance found that more than a third of non-retired investors aged 18-54 acted on financial information from the internet or social media that turned out to be misleading or incorrect.
Government Overreach in the Age of AI
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) further complicates matters. We’ve already seen instances of AI-generated images causing market jitters, such as when someone posted fake images of an explosion near the Pentagon last year. As AI technology advances, distinguishing fact from fiction will become increasingly challenging.
Given these challenges, it’s no surprise that Americans are expressing a historic lack of confidence in news media and issuing calls for increased regulation of online content.
However, we must be extremely cautious about how we approach this issue. Governments, in their wisdom or perhaps in their panic, have decided to step in, and they’re not just playing referee… They’re threatening to be the players, coaches and umpires all at once.
International Implications of Social Media Policing
Take the recent violence in the United Kingdom. False rumors quickly spread about the identity of the man who allegedly attacked and killed two British girls on July 29, leading to nationwide riots and the arrest of over 1,000 people. So far, two men have been sentenced to months in prison for their activity on social media.
While it’s understandable that authorities want to crack down on those inciting violence, the British government’s threats have, in my opinion, gone too far. London’s police chief has even suggested that American citizens may be extradited from the U.S. to the U.K. to face charges for online comments. This is a dangerous overreach that sets a troubling precedent.
Similarly, the European Union’s warning to Elon Musk about content moderation on X (formerly Twitter) ahead of his Monday interview with former President Donald Trump smacked of attempted censorship. I agree that these platforms should have policies against explicitly illegal content, but vague “hate speech” laws are a slippery slope that can easily be abused.
Building a Balanced Information Diet
Here’s my take: Yes, misinformation is a problem. It can contribute to real-world chaos, from market fluctuations to societal unrest. But the solution isn’t to throw the baby out with the bathwater. We need to be smarter, not just louder.
That starts with educating ourselves. In the investment world, we’ve always lived by “trust, but verify.” It’s time we apply this to our information diet by fact-checking the news as though our portfolios depend on it. And just like our portfolios, it’s important to diversify where we get our news.
Having said that, I believe that if a social platform is going to moderate content, it must do so transparently. Let’s know the rules of the game. Vague threats of “hate speech” without clear definitions? That’s like playing chess where the rules change every move.
Vigilance and Liberty
Benjamin Franklin wisely said that those who would give up their liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. The challenges of being an informed citizen and investor in today’s information landscape are real, but I don’t believe they justify heavy-handed government intervention.
Misinformation is a beast, but so is overreach. Let’s stay vigilant, think critically and remember that the free flow of information—even when it’s occasionally messy—is essential for both healthy markets and healthy democracies.
Stay invested, stay informed and most importantly, stay free.
Related: Understanding the Yen Carry Trade Impact on World Markets