Employees are a company’s biggest asset. The success or failure of any company is largely determined by how skillful, motivated and productive its employees are. An environment of trust and open communication is crucial for developing an organizational culture in which employees can perform at their peak ability and capacity. Managers benefit by creating and fostering such an environment, and in order to be successful, both managers and employees must be able to exercise a critical skill of giving, as well as receiving, feedback.
The many advantages of constructive feedback are widely acknowledged and hailed by a vast majority of present-day business leaders. Timely and sound feedback allows for expedient evaluation and optimization of the employee’s performance, which in turn streamlines organizational processes and communication flow, obviating numerous potential setbacks and the need to spend time and resources correcting them. While recognizing the benefits of constructive feedback, scores of managers and company employees quickly lose their nerve at the thought of personally giving or receiving feedback, and try everything in their power to avoid dealing with it altogether.
In the minds of far too many, “feedback” has developed a negative connotation. Psychologically damaging effects of the negative past experiences of being exposed to verbal attacks, poorly constructed criticism or meaningless advice – all conveniently labeled “feedback” – usually prove to be a main cause of the feedback-associated apprehension or fear. If the employee’s response to the manager’s feedback is lukewarm at best, there are undoubtedly some roadblocks at play that cause the effectiveness and value of managerial feedback to diminish. Some of the most common impediments to effective feedback are:
Both reinforcing (positive) and corrective (negative) feedback are valuable learning experiences. It seems logical that good, constructive feedback provides its recipients with important pieces of information that has power to help them do a better job in the future. Effective feedback will motivate its receiver to improve and strive to do well, whereas poor quality feedback will only confuse and exasperate. Oftentimes, having received terribly constructed and delivered feedback, employees feel helpless, unappreciated or looked down upon by their colleagues, team leaders or managers, and instead of learning from that experience they would condemn the one who gave them the evaluation.
Between unclear and inaccurate feedback, the former is the lesser of two evils; unsound feedback not only leads to bitterness and outrage, but it also undermines the manager’s trustworthiness – and therefore authority – in the eyes of the employees. When administering corrective feedback, it is imperative for the manager to be open to discussion, in addition to being well-informed and objective.
Positive feedback, on the other hand, although less “popular” than corrective, is just as essential for employees’ success. Mistakenly, many managers believe that reinforcing feedback is limited to “You did well!” and “Great job”. Neither one should be considered feedback, as they provide no analysis, advice, plan of action or any other learning opportunities. They are simply trite statements that have no real value to their recipients. Employees need to understand exactly what they are doing well. Not only that, they need to be able to take that knowledge and apply it in future to ensure continuous improvement. If the feedback employees receive has no substance to it, no improvement will take place.
It is certainly easier to hear what we want or like to hear, rather than what is necessary; however, the latter is far more meaningful and significant for the personal, as well as professional, learning and development of any individual. Research shows that most leaders understand this fact, and therefore willingly seek feedback from others. Based on a study of 51,896 executives, professional services firm Zenger Folkman discovered that leaders who ask for feedback are substantially more effective than those who do not. For instance, the research findings demonstrate that leaders who ranked at the top 10% in asking for feedback were rated, on average, at the 86th percentile in overall leadership effectiveness:
In a smaller study of 22,719 leaders, Zenger Folkman unveiled a relationship between feedback and employee engagement levels: The leaders who ranked in the top 10% in their ability to give honest feedback received engagement scores from their subordinates in the 77th percentile in engagement, and conversely the leaders who ranked at the bottom 10% got engagement scores that averaged in the 25th percentile:
The value of constructive feedback – to employees, managers and companies – cannot be overemphasized. Think through and keep in mind the following recommendations to guarantee that the next time you give feedback it is on point: