The robo-advisor and its collision with traditional advisors has become a media staple. Conversations focused on robos and the changing landscape of technology take center stage among financial advisors and industry leaders. Warnings of fee compression and competitive automated services that robos provide are abound in the headlines.
There seems to be no argument that robo-advisors are driving change in the financial services industry. The debatable questions holding strong are, “To what degree is the robo invasion imposing threats in the traditional advisor space?” And, “Is there an urgent need to compete with them to remain viable?”
Robo-advisors come in a variety of fashions that focus on low cost and offer an array of options from online investment services, subscription options, and combo packages; offering both online and human assistance. The idea of automated computer algorithms that allocate, redistribute, and rebalance investments with minimal human interaction appeals to some, while others are not warming up to the idea.
Is the digital explosion of online wealth management a threat to our once comfortable human-to-human interaction? Or, is this the harsh push needed for traditional advisors to embrace new technology that most have been slow to adapt?
How Robos Are Impacting Traditional Advisory Firms
The impact of social, mobile, and digital technology is blatantly apparent. Client expectations have changed as consumers utilize online resources as a first step to find products and services, and financial advice is no exception. Consumers who interact with companies online are 40 percent more likely to buy products and services from them; which tells us there is a key shift in the way consumers determine who to do business with.¹ They are expressing confidence and trust in technology to help them make educated decisions.
While robo-advisors have garnered more than $19 billion in assets², a survey by Accenture says that just 19 percent of U.S. and Canadian advisors see robos as a severe threat.³ The survey goes on to say that some advisors still have plans to integrate robo-advisors into their business as part of an inexpensive way to serve the Henry investors (High Earning Not Rich Yet) who may become full-service clients.⁴
Evan Shear-CFP® , founding partner at CrossleyShear Wealth Management , covers all aspects of financial planning at his practice in Florida. When asked how robo-advisors have or will impact his firm, Mr. Shear says, “I think the idea of a robo-advisor should wake all of us up in that we need to refine and strive to differentiate ourselves and our services offered. We don’t feel it will diminish our practice. We could lose some that don’t need or want real advice from real people, but those are not the type of clients we wish to work with.”
A recent Gallup poll helps calm advisor anxiety concerning robos. The survey cites that more than 85 percent of investors want to have some level of access to human advisors, even if digital tools are involved in their investment decisions. The results of the survey show that human advisors can be assured they have a role in providing value to clients.
Rex Whiteside , President of Whiteside Wealth Management, Inc. in Houston, Texas, tells us, “It (robo-advisors) has caused us to raise our level of service in planning as investment management has become less of a differentiator. Just as younger and smaller investors have benefited from the automation of investment management, advisors are also benefiting. We have been able to increase our services at a lower cost and with less staff.”
Technological development and the automated advice platforms offered by robos pose as a threat to some advisors and make it difficult to compete, especially against their lower fees. On the other hand, there are a number of advisors who feel confident that their clients, referral networks, and centers of influence will alleviate the robo challenge, while others are taking steps to shield their firm from any potential attack.
In short, it seems most advisors will work toward a solution that capitalizes on offering additional services, incorporate workflows and processes to operate more efficiently, and deliver valuable, high-level client service.
What Investors Want That Robos Can’t Provide
Traditional advisors can benefit from the influx of robos by taking a look at one key question, “What do investors want that robos can’t provide?” A recent survey by Investment Management Consultants Association (IMCA) found that investors seek four primary services, none of which robos can deliver:
“To most investors, cutting-edge strategies don’t have to do with aligning the best funds or timing the market,” says Sean Walters, IMCA CEO. “It has to do with helping clients align their objectives, finding the right allocations and buckets for their planning. Clients want to feel confident that the processes their advisors use have a long-term outlook.”
“Investors need/want solutions to holistic planning and investment management,” says Whiteside. “With a robo you can attempt to align your investments with your risk tolerance but how do you tie your investments to your financial goals and needs? We also find one of the largest aspects of successful investment management ties into behavior. This is behavior during both good and bad market cycles. Understanding the client’s state of mind during periods of fear and greed avoids possible tragic mistakes. When emotions enter the equation, I think the automated robo advisor falls short.”
Shear adds, “People want someone that can relate to their concerns, issues, problems, and dreams. A machine cannot do that. A machine doesn’t know the pain of losing a parent and how to deal with costs associated with caring for a loved one. We have lived those real life events and can apply our experiences with our clients.”
What investors want are services that can’t typically be delivered well by a robo-advisor, creating the opportunity for traditional advisors to market their human touch.
The Opportunity for Traditional Advisors – 10-Steps to Robo-Proof Your Advisory Firm
Robo-advisors are not likely to be a passing trend. Advisors should view their disturbance as a wakeup call to clearly communicate human advisor differentiation. Investors seek greater value from financial advisors. Advisors can embrace this disruption and use it to their advantage by creating an efficient, high-touch, personal service offering to clients.
Whiteside says his firm has taken steps to stay competitive with robos. “(We) have increased efficiency by going paperless, and incorporated Riskalyze.com (a risk alignment platform) to better understand our clients’ true risk tolerance – then match it with a customized investment solution. In addition, we utilize performance reporting that centers around clients’ needed return and not just benchmarks.”
What specific steps can you take to compete, survive, and remain relevant in a new investment and wealth management environment? There are tactics your firm can deploy to minimize effects of the robo-advisor platform, and continue to attract ideal clients while improving the services you provide. This will involve communicating the advantages of your service model and incorporating a clearly defined process that differentiates and distances you from robo-advisors.
1) Anticipate Needs
2) Know Your Unique Value Proposition
3) Actively Engage on Social Media
4) Host Client Events
5) Become a Specialist
6) Communicate with Clients
7) Provide Other Areas of Financial Service
8) Re-invent Your Marketing Message
9) Offer Selected Services Online
10) Don’t Forget Next-Gen
Maintaining a Thriving Advisory Practice
In conclusion, robo-advisors are shaking up the world of wealth management. The disruption doesn’t have to be detrimental to your practice. Instead, roll with the changes and create an extraordinary human touch that is impossible for robos to replicate.
“Digital allows for quicker access to share info with our clients. We have to be careful to not be too digital that we forget the physical. Always move forward and provide the best possible personal service,” says Shear.